<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Grading, no longer an obstacle to learners’ attendance to teacher feedback</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>129</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>143</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15475</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2013.15475</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nemati</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Azizi</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Learners are often reported not to be motivated enough to attend to teacher feedback. Teachers &lt;br /&gt;also  tend  to  grade  learners’  writing  samples  when  providing  them  with  corrective  feedback &lt;br /&gt;though  they  know  it  may  divert  their  attention  away  from  teacher  feedback.  However,  not &lt;br /&gt;grading learner writings does not seem to be an option due to both learners’ demands for it and &lt;br /&gt;institutional  regulations  that  require  teachers  to  have  summative  evaluation.  In  order  to &lt;br /&gt;overcome  such  contradictions,  a  new  technique  called  Draft-Specific  Scoring  (DSS)  was &lt;br /&gt;devised  in  order  to  use  grading  as  a  motivating,  rather  than  demotivating,  device  in  order  to &lt;br /&gt;encourage learners to attend to teacher feedback and apply it to their first drafts to improve the &lt;br /&gt;quality  of  their  writing  accordingly.  DSS  is  a  grading  system  in  which  learners  can  improve &lt;br /&gt;their received grade by applying teacher feedback to their writing samples in order to improve &lt;br /&gt;its quality. The score they receive will improve as a result of the improvement in the quality of &lt;br /&gt;the revisions they make. They have two opportunities to go through this procedure. Their final &lt;br /&gt;score  will  be  the  mean  score  of  all  the  grades  they  receive  in  their  last  drafts  submitted.  This &lt;br /&gt;experimental  study  was  an  attempt  to  check  the  effect  of  the  use  of  this  technique  in  error &lt;br /&gt;feedback  provision  on  three  measures  of  fluency,  grammatical  complexity,  and  accuracy.  The &lt;br /&gt;results  showed  that  DSS  could  help  learners  improve  in  all  three  measures  while  the  control &lt;br /&gt;group receiving only error feedback without DSS could only improve in fluency.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Draft-Specific Scoring</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Corrective Feedback</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Writing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fluency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">grammatical complexity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Accuracy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15475_c3cd201ed7e75e4eb1318511a45eef53.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
