<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Interface between L2 learners’ pragmatic performance, language proficiency, and individual/group ZPD</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>31</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>44</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15495</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15495</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zia</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tajeddin</LastName>
<Affiliation>Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farhad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tayebipour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the theories accounting for pragmatic development of L2 learners is Vygotsky’s (1978) &lt;br /&gt;sociocultural  theory.  This  study  investigated  the  development  of  EFL  learners&#039;  pragmatic &lt;br /&gt;competence through the lens of an important concept of Vygotsky’s theory, i.e.  the  zone  of &lt;br /&gt;proximal  development.  The  study  was  conducted  to  answer  two  questions.  The  first  question &lt;br /&gt;was whether the amount of scaffolding provided to EFL learners would have any relationship &lt;br /&gt;with  their  proficiency  level.  The  second  question  was  focused  on  the  investigation  of  the &lt;br /&gt;relationship  between  learners’  individual  ZPDs  and  the  group  ZPD.  To  this  end,  20  EFL &lt;br /&gt;learners  at  low  vs.  high  proficiency  levels  were  selected  and  assigned  randomly  into  two &lt;br /&gt;groups.  Both  groups  received  ZPD-sensitive  instruction  to  produce  the  two  speech  acts  of &lt;br /&gt;request and apology. The findings indicated no significant relationship between the proficiency &lt;br /&gt;level  of  the  participants  and  the  amount  of  scaffolding  given  for  the  production  of  the  two &lt;br /&gt;speech  acts.  However,  the  findings  revealed  certain  relationship  between  participants&#039; &lt;br /&gt;individual ZPDs and their group ZPD. This study suggests that EFL learners&#039; general language &lt;br /&gt;proficiency has little impact on the development of their pragmatic competence. Besides, based &lt;br /&gt;on  the  findings,  scaffolding  seems  to  have  learner-specific  effects,  meaning  that  each  learner &lt;br /&gt;may need a specific amount of scaffolding for his/her ZPD to grow despite being in the same &lt;br /&gt;group ZPD.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language proficiency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pragmatic competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interlanguage pragmatics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Individual ZPD</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Group ZPD</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15495_1c0fc045a3837fe16b2e8f247bf7f37e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
