<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reassembling Formal Features in Articles by L1 Persian Learners of L2 English</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>43</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>61</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15502</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15502</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Marjansadat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Momenzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor, University of Sheikhbahaee, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Manijeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Youhanaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>There  has  been  considerable  debate  over  what  the  sources  of  morphological  variation  in  second  language &lt;br /&gt;acquisition  are.  From  among  various  hypotheses  put  forth  on  the  topic,  the  feature  reassembly  hypothesis &lt;br /&gt;(Lardiere, 2005) assumes that it is the reconfiguration of features in the L2 which causes variation between &lt;br /&gt;the performance of natives and non-natives. Acknowledged as one of the most difficult elements of English &lt;br /&gt;grammar  to  be  acquired  by  learners,  the  article  system  was  the  focus  of  the  present  study  which  aimed  at &lt;br /&gt;attending to the acquisition of that system by Persian learners. This descriptive piece of research focused on &lt;br /&gt;how the article system functions in English and Persian, the similarities found across the two languages and &lt;br /&gt;the  possible  sources  of  difficulty  for  Persian  learners  in  using  English  articles  as  related  to  their  L1.  The &lt;br /&gt;participants included Persian  learners at three levels of  grammatical  knowledge.  A group of English native &lt;br /&gt;speakers also took part in the study. A grammaticality judgment test and a translation test were conducted to &lt;br /&gt;collect  data.  Comparisons  were  made  among  the  four  groups,  using  ANOVAs.  Based  on  the  results,  it  is &lt;br /&gt;argued that the observed pattern of article use among Persian speaking learners can be best accounted for by &lt;br /&gt;the feature reassembly hypothesis. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">countability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Definiteness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reassembly hypothesis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">genericity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">number</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">specificity</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15502_83adc4f7c056f9635ba629282507cde9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
