<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Constructing Political Reality: Corpus-Based Evidence of Framing and Ideological Language in Brexit Media Discourse</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>36</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30667</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2026.149533.2775</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehrdad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vasheghani Farahani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Lancaster University, UK</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Elshahat Abdelghaffar Omar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Leipzig University, Germany</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Brexit prompted an extraordinary volume of media coverage, characterized by ideological conflict and competing political narratives. Using a 125-million-word corpus of Brexit-related texts, this study applies a corpus-based critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to examine how language actively constructs political meaning rather than simply reporting events. The findings identify four dominant discursive frames: (1) campaign-related discourse, (2) representations of political actors and institutions, (3) evaluative and ideological language, and (4) future-oriented projections. Together, these frames shape a highly polarized interpretive landscape in which Brexit emerges not merely as a political process but as a contested ideological symbol. The analysis demonstrates how framing strategies and evaluative lexical choices work collectively to produce political meaning within contemporary hybrid media environments. By highlighting the role of language in shaping public perceptions and political identities, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how ideological discourse and evaluative stance foster polarization in modern media ecologies. The findings also emphasize the importance of critical media literacy and illustrate the value of corpus-assisted discourse analysis for investigating political conflict and public debate in networked societies.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Brexit Referendum</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Leave Vote</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Critical discourse analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Corpus Linguistics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ideological Language</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Media Analysis</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_30667_9a7ec49a1048e2351de61e7f35d83f51.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
