<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Designing reading tasks to maximise vocabulary learning</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>8</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15481</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15481</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Paul</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nation</LastName>
<Affiliation>Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Most vocabulary learning should occur incidentally through listening and reading. This is one of &lt;br /&gt;the  reasons  why  a  substantial  extensive  reading  program  is  an  important  part  of  an  English &lt;br /&gt;course.  Extensive  reading  requires  the  learners  to  do  large quantities  of  reading  using  material &lt;br /&gt;that  is  at  the  right  level  for  them.  Vocabulary  learning  occurs  through  the  conditions  of &lt;br /&gt;repetition,  retrieval,  creative  use,  and  deliberate  attention.  These  conditions  can  be  maximized &lt;br /&gt;when reading through the use of narrow reading, repeated reading, linked skills reading, reading &lt;br /&gt;with  discussion,  and  deliberate  learning  through  reading  with  exercises.  Computer-based &lt;br /&gt;activities can be effective in  providing opportunities for deliberate learning, but it is important &lt;br /&gt;that deliberate learning does not take time away from extensive reading.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Vocabulary Learning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conditions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">extensive reading</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15481_455aa60c0cbda93a33517647aac5d399.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Motivation, amount of interaction, length of residence, and ESL learners’ pragmatic competence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>9</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15482</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15482</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zohre</FirstName>
					<LastName>R Eslami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Texas A&amp;M University, USA</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Soo</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jin Ahn</LastName>
<Affiliation>Texas A&amp;M University, USA</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study examined how motivation for learning English, the amount of contact with English, &lt;br /&gt;and  length  of  residence  in  the  target language area affects Korean graduate students’ English &lt;br /&gt;pragmatic skills. The study attempted to account for differential pragmatic development among &lt;br /&gt;50  graduate-level  Korean  students  in  relation  to  individual  factors  mentioned  above.  The  data &lt;br /&gt;were collected using three types of elicitation instruments: a written background questionnaire, &lt;br /&gt;a  discourse  completion  test,  and  the  mini-Attitude/Motivation  Test  Battery.  Descriptive  and &lt;br /&gt;inferential statistics (correlation coefficients, and multiple regressions) were used to analyze the &lt;br /&gt;data.  The  findings  of  the  study  revealed  that  (a)  the  level  of  motivation  had  a  positive  and &lt;br /&gt;moderate relationship with the ESL learners’ L2 pragmatic competence; and (b) the amount of &lt;br /&gt;L2 contact and length of residence had only a weak and insignificant impact on the participants’ &lt;br /&gt;pragmatic competence.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Motivation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">amount of interaction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ESL</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pragmatic competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">length of stay</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15482_524c66043e203c10b6bde947a6fb828e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The relationship between task repetition and language proficiency</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>40</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15478</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15478</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mojavezi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Task  repetition  is  now  considered  as  an  important  task-based  implementation  variable  which &lt;br /&gt;can affect complexity, accuracy, and fluency of L2 speech. However, in order to move towards &lt;br /&gt;theorizing  the  role  of  task  repetition  in  second  language  acquisition,  it  is  necessary  that &lt;br /&gt;individual variables be taken into account. The present study aimed to investigate the way task &lt;br /&gt;repetition  correlates  with  language  proficiency  and  the  differential  effects  that  task  repetition &lt;br /&gt;might  have  on  the  complexity,  accuracy,  and  fluency  of  L2  learners  with  different  levels  of &lt;br /&gt;proficiency.  Fifty  language  learners  of  different  levels  of  proficiency,  selected  from  two &lt;br /&gt;different  language  centers,  participated  in  this  study.  They  were  asked  to  perform  an  oral &lt;br /&gt;narrative  task  twice  with  a  one-week  interval.  Results  revealed  that,  compared  to  the &lt;br /&gt;participants  with  lower  L2  proficiency,  participants  with  higher  levels  of  L2  proficiency &lt;br /&gt;produced  more  complex,  accurate,  and  fluent  speech  on  the  second  encounter  with  the  same &lt;br /&gt;task.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Accuracy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Complexity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fluency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language proficiency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">task repetition</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15478_d04596f0938a912b67ebb12bbc851278.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The effect of increase in task cognitive complexity on Iranian EFL learners’ accuracy and linguistic complexity: A test of Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>41</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>54</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15476</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15476</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soleimani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rezazadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Designing a task with a reasonable level of cognitive complexity has always been important for &lt;br /&gt;syllabus designers, teachers, as well as researchers. This is because task manipulation may lead &lt;br /&gt;to different results in oral production. The present study was an attempt to explore the effect of &lt;br /&gt;this  manipulation  -  based  on  Robinson’s  resource-directing  model  (reasoning  demands, &lt;br /&gt;number of elements, and here and now versus there and then condition) - on picture narration. &lt;br /&gt;The  study  included  30  Iranian  EFL  learners  at  the  intermediate  level  between  the  ages  of  21 &lt;br /&gt;and 34. They were all native speakers of Persian. Each participant was required to perform the &lt;br /&gt;simple  version  as  well  as  the  complex  version  of  the  same  picture  narration  task.  The &lt;br /&gt;participants’  speechwas  audio-recorded  and  the  results  revealed  that  an  increase  in  task &lt;br /&gt;cognitive complexity leads to greater accuracy and linguistic complexity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Complexity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Accuracy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Task</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">EFL Learners</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cognitive Complexity</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15476_ff30cdc4589cdeadca0b4350635fd4dc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The effect of reading purpose on incidental vocabulary learning and retention among elementary Iranian learners of English</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>55</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>66</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15477</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15477</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eghtesadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Abbaszadegan Institute for Educational Research, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sakine</FirstName>
					<LastName>Momeni</LastName>
<Affiliation>Hakim Sabzevari University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study, situated in an EFL context, aimed at discovering the ways purposes behind reading &lt;br /&gt;activities  influence  vocabulary  knowledge  gain  and  retrieval.  Seventy  five  elementary  learners &lt;br /&gt;of  English  were  randomly  assigned  to  three  groups  of  ‘free  reading’,  ‘reading  comprehension’ &lt;br /&gt;and ‘reading to summarize’. A modified text was administered to all the three groups. The data &lt;br /&gt;in  both  immediate  and  delayed  post-test  revealed  that  both  vocabulary  learning  and  retention &lt;br /&gt;were  greatly  influenced  by  the  purposeful  reading  activity.  The  Scheffe  post-hoc  test  revealed &lt;br /&gt;that  the  mean  scores  of  the  ‘summarizing’  and  ‘reading  comprehension’  groups  were &lt;br /&gt;significantly  different  from  the  mean  score  of  the  ‘free  reading’  group.  But  the  results  did  not &lt;br /&gt;indicate  any  significant  differences  between  the  mean  scores  of  the  two  groups  of &lt;br /&gt;‘summarizing’  and  ‘reading  comprehension’.  However  the  strength  of  association  for  the &lt;br /&gt;immediate  post-test  and  the  delayed  one  showed  that  a  large  part  of  the  variance  between  the &lt;br /&gt;three groups could be explained by the reading purpose. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Vocabulary Learning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conditions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">extensive reading</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">EFL</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15477_da78563f1b11c68dc9d998ee0618d117.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Pragmatic comprehension of apology, request and refusal: An investigation on the effect of consciousness-raising video-driven prompts</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>67</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>86</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15479</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15479</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Parviz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Birjandi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Derakhshan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Recent  research  in  interlanguage  pragmatics  (ILP)  has  substantiated  that  some  aspects  of &lt;br /&gt;pragmatics are amenable to instruction in the second or foreign language classroom. However, &lt;br /&gt;there  are  still  controversies  over  the  most  conducive  teaching  approaches  and  the  required &lt;br /&gt;materials.  Therefore,  this  study  aims  to  investigate  the  relative  effectiveness  of  consciousness-raising video-driven prompts on the comprehension of the three speech acts of apology, request, &lt;br /&gt;and  refusal  on  seventy  eight  (36  male  and  42  female)  upper-intermediate  Persian  learners  of &lt;br /&gt;English  who  were  randomly  assigned  to  four  groups    (metapragmatic,  form-search,  role  play, &lt;br /&gt;and  control).  The  four  groups  were  exposed  to  45  video  vignettes  (15  for  each  speech  act) &lt;br /&gt;extracted from different episodes of Flash Forward,  Stargate TV Series and Annie Hall Film for &lt;br /&gt;nine  60-minute  sessions  of  instruction  twice  a  week.    Results  of  the  multiple  choice  discourse &lt;br /&gt;completion test (MDCT) indicated that learners’ awareness  of  apologies,  requests  and  refusals &lt;br /&gt;benefit  from  all  three  types  of  instruction,  but  the  results  of  the  Post  hoc  test  of  Tukey  (HSD) &lt;br /&gt;illustrated  that  the  metapragmatic  group  outperformed  the  other  treatment  groups,  and  that &lt;br /&gt;form-search group had a better performance than role-play and control groups. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pragmalinguistic knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sociopragmatic knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Consciousness-raising</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">EFL</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15479_69dfb028345a693cc42be5821f39ade9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3134-0644</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>87</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>100</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15480</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2014.15480</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghafar Samar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pourmohamadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Afsaneh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abaszadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The  current  study  investigated  the  expression  of  disagreement  by  Iranian  advanced  English &lt;br /&gt;learners.  The  data  for  the  study  comprised  the  recorded  discussions  of  26  male  and  female &lt;br /&gt;interlocutors  in  three  different  settings:  1)  language  institute,  2)  home  environment,  and  3) &lt;br /&gt;university  setting.  Analysis  of  the  arguments  pointed  to  the  influence  of  contextual  factors. &lt;br /&gt;More precisely, disagreements  were  found to be complex and  multidirectional  speech acts and &lt;br /&gt;thus  various  factors,  including  the  interlocutors’  power,  relationships,  background,  and  the &lt;br /&gt;situational context, influence their realization as face-threatening or face-enhancing speech acts. &lt;br /&gt;Therefore,  the  linguistic  markers  cannot  safely  categorize  disagreement  turns  into &lt;br /&gt;polite/impolite or preferred/dispreferred acts.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Argument</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Disagreement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Politeness strategies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Speech acts</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conversation analysis</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
