<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>EFL learners’ motivational beliefs and their use of learning strategies</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>18</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15496</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15496</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rezaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Shiva</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kaivanpanah</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5484-3869</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sedigheh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Najibi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty Member, Columbia College,Fairfax, Virginia, USA</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The  present  study  attempted  to  examine  the  relationship  between  English  as  a  Foreign &lt;br /&gt;Language  (EFL)  learners’ motivational beliefs and their use of learning strategies. The three &lt;br /&gt;components  of  motivation,  i.e.  expectancy  component,  value  component  and  affective &lt;br /&gt;component,  were  examined  in  relation  to  metacognitive,  cognitive  and  effort  management &lt;br /&gt;strategies.  Two hundred and fifty seven EFL learners representing different proficiency levels &lt;br /&gt;completed the Persian version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), &lt;br /&gt;which consisted of motivation scale and learning strategies scale. The analysis of the effect of &lt;br /&gt;proficiency level on motivational beliefs showed a significant effect of proficiency level on test &lt;br /&gt;anxiety and extrinsic goal orientation, suggesting that less proficient learners were significantly &lt;br /&gt;more anxious and more extrinsically oriented compared to advanced learners of English. It was &lt;br /&gt;also  found  that  self-efficacy,  control  of  learning  beliefs,  intrinsic  goal  orientation  and  task &lt;br /&gt;value could account for 70% of variations in self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies. Based on &lt;br /&gt;the  findings  of  this  study,  several  suggestions  are  made  to  aid  instructors  in  creating  a  non-product-oriented  approach  to  learning,  which  promotes  foreign  language  learners’  learning &lt;br /&gt;outcomes. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Self-regulated learning (SRL)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">motivational beliefs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">learning strategies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15496_f30c2d6632da64a9dd4abe9d43574381.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The effect of task-based instruction on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>19</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>30</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15497</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15497</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azizeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Chalak</LastName>
<Affiliation>Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Developing reading comprehension ability is an important aspect in acquisition of a language. &lt;br /&gt;The  present  study  focused  on  improving  reading  comprehension  ability  through  Task-based &lt;br /&gt;Instruction  (TBI).  TBI  is  a  methodology  that  develops  from  a  focus  on  classroom  tasks.  The &lt;br /&gt;participants of the study were 135 Iranian female students at different levels selected from high &lt;br /&gt;schools  in  Isfahan,  Iran,  through  a  quasi-experimental  design.  The  participants  were  divided &lt;br /&gt;into four groups, two control groups (CGs) and two experimental groups (EGs). They received &lt;br /&gt;a  pre-test,  the  instruction,  and  a  post-test.  The  participants  in  EGs  were  taught  through  TBI, &lt;br /&gt;whereas  CGs  were  exposed  to  a  traditional  method.  The  comparison  between  CGs  and  EGs &lt;br /&gt;were  made  through  paired  sample  t-tests.  The  results  revealed  that  the  students  in  EGs &lt;br /&gt;outperformed  CGs.  The  difference  between  the  two  grades  was  also  investigated  by &lt;br /&gt;independent sample t-test. The results showed that students at first-grade outperformed fourth-graders.  The  findings  suggest  that  using  flexible  and  interactive  tasks  in  English  classes &lt;br /&gt;improves  reading  comprehension  ability  of  Iranian  EFL  learners.  This  study  may  have &lt;br /&gt;pedagogical  implications  for  practitioners  in  the  field  and  for  syllabus  designers  to  include &lt;br /&gt;appropriate tasks in English textbooks.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Task</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Reading Comprehension</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Task-Based Instruction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Language Learning</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15497_ae38449368f0671ffc921cda1b0333e4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Interface between L2 learners’ pragmatic performance, language proficiency, and individual/group ZPD</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>31</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>44</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15495</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15495</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zia</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tajeddin</LastName>
<Affiliation>Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farhad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tayebipour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the theories accounting for pragmatic development of L2 learners is Vygotsky’s (1978) &lt;br /&gt;sociocultural  theory.  This  study  investigated  the  development  of  EFL  learners&#039;  pragmatic &lt;br /&gt;competence through the lens of an important concept of Vygotsky’s theory, i.e.  the  zone  of &lt;br /&gt;proximal  development.  The  study  was  conducted  to  answer  two  questions.  The  first  question &lt;br /&gt;was whether the amount of scaffolding provided to EFL learners would have any relationship &lt;br /&gt;with  their  proficiency  level.  The  second  question  was  focused  on  the  investigation  of  the &lt;br /&gt;relationship  between  learners’  individual  ZPDs  and  the  group  ZPD.  To  this  end,  20  EFL &lt;br /&gt;learners  at  low  vs.  high  proficiency  levels  were  selected  and  assigned  randomly  into  two &lt;br /&gt;groups.  Both  groups  received  ZPD-sensitive  instruction  to  produce  the  two  speech  acts  of &lt;br /&gt;request and apology. The findings indicated no significant relationship between the proficiency &lt;br /&gt;level  of  the  participants  and  the  amount  of  scaffolding  given  for  the  production  of  the  two &lt;br /&gt;speech  acts.  However,  the  findings  revealed  certain  relationship  between  participants&#039; &lt;br /&gt;individual ZPDs and their group ZPD. This study suggests that EFL learners&#039; general language &lt;br /&gt;proficiency has little impact on the development of their pragmatic competence. Besides, based &lt;br /&gt;on  the  findings,  scaffolding  seems  to  have  learner-specific  effects,  meaning  that  each  learner &lt;br /&gt;may need a specific amount of scaffolding for his/her ZPD to grow despite being in the same &lt;br /&gt;group ZPD.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language proficiency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pragmatic competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interlanguage pragmatics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Individual ZPD</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Group ZPD</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15495_1c0fc045a3837fe16b2e8f247bf7f37e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Individuality in Higher Education: The Use of the Multiple-Mnemonic Method to Enhance ESP Students' Vocabulary Development (Depth and Size) and Retention</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>45</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>58</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15498</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15498</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amiryousefi</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Vocabulary learning is considered to be the most comprehensive and the most difficult part of&lt;br /&gt; language learning for all the students especially for ESP students. These students complain that&lt;br /&gt; vocabulary items are too many and are easily forgotten after they are learned. Mnemonic&lt;br /&gt; devices, a group of mental strategies, are developed to facilitate vocabulary learning and&lt;br /&gt; retention for such students. These students, however, have varied needs and interests and if&lt;br /&gt; vocabulary teaching and learning are planned to be effective and enjoyable, various methods&lt;br /&gt; and strategies must be employed. To this end, the multiple-mnemonic method was developed&lt;br /&gt; and studied. Two intact groups of ESP students participated in this study. In the experimental&lt;br /&gt; group the multiple-mnemonic method was used while in the control group the vocabulary&lt;br /&gt; items were just taught and reviewed. The results of the study showed that the multiplemnemonic&lt;br /&gt; method group significantly performed better than the control group in terms of&lt;br /&gt; vocabulary development and retention. EVKS was also further evaluated and used in this study&lt;br /&gt; as a measure of vocabulary size and vocabulary depth.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Individuality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">multiple-mnemonic method</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">vocabulary size</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">vocabulary depth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mnemonic devices</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Multiple</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mnemonic method</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">EVKS</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15498_799c61b0ef7323d6453605546ccc9f9f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Testing a model of L2 communication among Iranian EFL learners: A path analysis framework</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>59</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>78</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15494</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15494</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nasser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fallah</LastName>
<Affiliation>English Department, University of Zabol, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Habibollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mashhady</LastName>
<Affiliation>English Department, University of Zabol, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Using  willingness  to  communicate  (WTC)  and  socio-educational  models  as  a  framework,  the &lt;br /&gt;present study aimed at examining WTC in English and its underlying variables in a sample of 372 &lt;br /&gt;Iranian  non-English  major  EFL  learners.  The  data  were  collected  through  self-reported &lt;br /&gt;questionnaires.  Path  analysis  framework  using  the  Amos  Program  with  maximum  likelihood &lt;br /&gt;estimation  was  also  utilized  to  examine  the  hypothesized  model  and  the  potential  relationships &lt;br /&gt;between the variables. The final model showed a very good fit to the data. The results of structural &lt;br /&gt;equation  modeling  revealed  that  self-perceived  communication  competence  (SPCC),  international &lt;br /&gt;posture  and  motivation  were  significant  predictors  of  L2WTC.  The  findings  also  showed  that  L2 &lt;br /&gt;communication anxiety (CA), motivation, personality trait of agreeableness and teacher immediacy &lt;br /&gt;could exert indirect effects on L2WTC. Furthermore, each of teacher immediacy and agreeableness &lt;br /&gt;variables  predicted  both  international  posture  and  CA  among  the  EFL  learners.  Following  these &lt;br /&gt;findings,  potential  factors  affecting  learners  WTC  should  receive  sufficient  attention  by  teachers, &lt;br /&gt;administrators  and  learners  alike.  By  adopting  more  immediacy  behaviors,  EFL  teachers  can  also &lt;br /&gt;establish relaxing and supportive classroom climate and lower the learners’ affective filter. In such &lt;br /&gt;an  atmosphere  learners  are  more  emotionally  secured,  suffer  less  communication  apprehension, &lt;br /&gt;perceive themselves to be more proficient and motivated, obtain promoted international posture by &lt;br /&gt;forming  realistic  attitudes  toward  different  cultures,  and  consequently  become  more  willing  to &lt;br /&gt;communicate in English.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Agreeableness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Posture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">L2 Communication anxiety</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Motivation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Self-perceived communication competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Teacher immediacy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Willingness to communicate in English</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15494_4bba9d29383de7b20d5f20b81d602ca7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Applied Research on English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0198</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Learning of relative clauses by L3 learners of English</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>79</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>106</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15493</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22108/are.2015.15493</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Laleh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moghtadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>sfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansour</FirstName>
					<LastName>Koosha</LastName>
<Affiliation>sfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Lotfi</LastName>
<Affiliation>sfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In surveys of third language acquisition (TLA) research, mixed results demonstrate that there is &lt;br /&gt;no consensus among researchers regarding the advantages and/or disadvantages of bilinguality &lt;br /&gt;on  TLA.  The  main  concern  of  the  present  study  was,  thus,  to  probe  the  probable  differences &lt;br /&gt;between  Persian  monolingual  and  Azeri-Persian  bilingual  learners  of  English  regarding  their &lt;br /&gt;syntactic  knowledge.  It  was  an  attempt  to  investigate  whether  they  differ  significantly  in &lt;br /&gt;learning  relative  clauses.  To  carry  out  this  study,  a  total  of  200  female  high  school  students &lt;br /&gt;studying at second grade were randomly selected from two educational districts of Tabriz and &lt;br /&gt;Shiraz  in  Iran.  The  participants  were  homogeneous  in  terms  of  English  proficiency,  sex,  and &lt;br /&gt;age. They attended public high schools; they were taught the same materials and had the same &lt;br /&gt;number  of  hours  of  instruction.  A  general  proficiency  test,  a  language  history  questionnaire, &lt;br /&gt;and  two  syntactic  structure  tasks  were  administered  to  both  groups.  Statistical  analyses &lt;br /&gt;including  t-tests  and  descriptive  statistics  revealed  that  monolinguals  and  bilinguals  differ  in &lt;br /&gt;the comprehension and production of English L3 relative clauses. </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Azeri</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bilingualism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">third language</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">third language acquisition</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language background</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Persian</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15493_c3e6e136037e3b40d70da2716565f10e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
